More Pages: india Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73


the popular, the classical, the inner & the other traditions
Superb book!!!!

humourous witty....he is the wittiest guy i've ever met, and also, by the way, the most intelligent! this book is a must read.
An Uplifting Story Based on the Author's Own Life StoryAutobiographical in nature, Trying to Grow brings a whole new and refreshing perspective to the world of human disability, eliminating any kind of "mush". There is a lot of honesty and energy in the way the story has been told. There is a vein of humor through out giving it a surprisingly upbeat tone. It is an exhilirating book which celebrates life more than anything else.


Much nicer than Aesop
Lessons for life

alltime classics
Excellent short stories by a big writer and film director

Sticks with youThe exciting thing about the book is Mehta's ability to describe, with incredible detail, the feeling, sounds, flavors and smells of his daily life, while portraying his growth and increasing self-reliance. A really touching memoir and one worth reading.
Vedi, by Ved MethaThe authors/protagonist childood is touchy and painful, but the innocence of the child shines through and was a great lesson for me. A book that will enrich any reader and nourish the mind and soul.


One of the best Indian cookbooks ever
Vegetarian Indian--by Shehzad Husain

academia and violence in the national set-upDrawing from an array of the most significant anglophone postcolonial critics such as Homi Bhabha, Gayatri Spivak, Stuart Hall and Ashis Nandy, Prem Poddar uses the Indian nation-state as a case-study in order to present a convincing account of how language and literature, within the institutions of public education and academia, have come to be represented as symptoms of certain national characters or characteristics, first by the colonial authorities, then later by Indian nationalist independence fighters and finally by literary critics from various backgrounds and nationalities. Poddar's analysis constitutes an urgent plead to take the historical grounding of the discipline of literature into consideration in the debate of its function and objectives as an academic discipline, and in doing so, he gives equal intention to the discursive as well as the institutional and political conditions of possibility, seeing them as a whole in which the subject of enunciation must be excavated and contextualised. Prem Poddar's book is highly recommendable not only because of its very competent engagement with postcolonial theory applied on archival research but also because of its bold and direct address of some of the basic epistemological, institutional presumptions which structure academic conceptualisation and evaluation of literature. Far from staying in the common binary between 'relativism' and 'universalism', Poddar's analysis demasks these concepts as parts of the same political take on culture and territory, a point which makes his work highly relevant beyond anglophone research areas. His refreshing courage to insist on and his ability to demonstrate how theory is practice, how discourse is event comes across as unusually forceful as it is adeptly concretised both in the historical and political context of post/colonialism and as it contributes in an innovative way to the ongoing debates about the formation and objectives of literary criticism.
Colonial and National ViolenceDrawing from an array of the most significant anglophone postcolonial critics such as Homi Bhabha, Gayatri Spivak, Stuart Hall and Ashis Nandy, Prem Poddar uses the Indian nation-state as a case-study in order to present a convincing account of how language and literature, within the institutions of public education and academia, have come to be represented as symptoms of certain national characters or characteristics, first by the colonial authorities, then later by Indian nationalist independence fighters and finally by literary critics from various backgrounds and nationalities. Poddar's analysis constitutes an urgent plea to take the historical grounding of the discipline of literature into consideration in the debate of its function and objectives as an academic discipline.In doing so, he gives equal attention to the discursive as well as the institutional and political conditions of possibility, seeing them as a whole in which the subject of enunciation must be excavated and contextualised
His unravelling of how British nationalist discourse has depended on and used literature as a means to promote its status by the creation of specific institutions is relentless in its questioning of the concept of 'universalism' of the Enlightenment. What is revealed in the postcolonial context is its incapacity to deal with incommensurable cultural formations whose translations and interactions cannot be fathomed in the notions of 'value' and 'development', 'progress' without these losing their imagined referents. At the same time, the independence of India has a certain limit in the sense that it has adopted the same power structures and epistemological grounding as the British empire, the same illusion about comprising difference under the label of diversity, glossing over or denying or suppressing any radical deviant behaviour. The book is rich on examples from the Indian archive of official reports and Poddar uses his analysis to criticise Indian nationalist politicians of independence for not having seized the opportunity to redefine and re-think the premises for a cultural and social collectivity.
This analysis also gives proof of how the thoughts of Frantz Fanon are used constructively in anglophone postcolonial theory as Poddar draws on his descriptions of how the colonised population can or will react by mimicry, direct opposition or by searching the desires and urges of the 'common people' in their struggle to evade the colonial jug. Poddar presents several examples of these 'phases' from the Indian-British implementing of nationalism on Indian territory, but does not submit this particular 'development' to the critique of the progressive temporality of development which is questioned through Bhabha's notion of 'time-lag' between the modern colonial centres and the traditional peripheral territories. This does not in any way make Poddar's argumentation less convincing but leaves Fanon appear as more limited by a determinist approach than what may be the case.
Prem Poddar's book is highly recommendable not only because of its very competent engagement with postcolonial theory applied on archival research but also because of its bold and direct address of some of the basic epistemological, institutional presumptions which structure academic conceptualisation and evaluation of literature. Far from staying in the common binary between 'relativism' and 'universalism', Poddar's analysis demasks these concepts as parts of the same political take on culture and territory, a point which makes his work highly relevant beyond anglophone research areas. His refreshing courage to insist on and his ability to demonstrate how theory is practice, how discourse is event comes across as unusually forceful as it is adeptly concretised both in the historical and political context of post/colonialism and as it contributes in an innovative way to the ongoing debates about the formation and objectives of literary criticism.


A truly excellent book.
Wellington's forgotten wars

Comprehensive details with striking picturesThe level of detail is appropriate for those readers above 15 years and above.
A great looking book

White Saris and sweet mangoes
An engrossing, enlightening read!
Plus for those planning a visit to India there is an extensive "Gazetteer" in the back with lists of sacred places, routes, festivals, ashrams.